Dear SQL Server Developer Community, I am pleased to report that the Microsoft JDBC Driver 4.0 for SQL Server is now. ![]() Microsoft JDBC Driver For SQL Server » 6.1.0.jre8. Microsoft JDBC Driver for SQL Server. Pure Java Kerberos Customers using non-Windows platforms now have the option of using for authentication. The table below summarizes available authentication options. Platform Authentication Non-Windows Pure Java Kerberos Non-Windows SQL Server Windows Pure Java Kerberos Windows SQL Server Windows Kerberos with NTLM backup Windows NTLM We have several customers who have tested Kerberos via our CTP driver, some using Linux in a cross-realm environment. Always On The Microsoft JDBC Driver 4.0 for SQL Server supports. Customers have the option to use AlwaysOn instead of database mirroring. Brother hl-l2380dw driver for chromebook. Some key features include • Ability to specify whether an application is connecting to an AlwaysOn Availability Group Cluster (multi subnet failover) • Ability to specify application intent as read only vs. Read/write Correlated Tracing with XEvents SQL Server 2012 introduces a for XEvents and users can choose to. Simply set appropriate parameters for logging, create an XEvents session and the Microsoft JDBC Driver 4.0 for SQL Server will send tracing information to XEvents to enable troubleshooting and monitoring. The correlation information will be available in all XEvent targets including in memory, the XEvents ring buffer, log files, and the viewer in management studio. FormatID change in XA Transactions Based on customer and partner feedback, we made a change to the way the FormatID field is handled in XA transactions. The Microsoft JDBC Driver 4.0 for SQL Server will now use the provided formatID field in all XA transactions. Other features Other features include UTF-16 support, enhanced SQL Azure support, support for sparse columns,and bug fixes. Documentation, Feedback and Download You can find documentation on the driver at our, obtain technical support via our or Microsoft Customer Support, report bugs via the, and (most importantly!) download the new driver. Thank you for your support and we look forward to your feedback. Shamitha Reddy Program Manager - Microsoft JDBC Driver for SQL Server. Can Microsoft conduct its own head-to-head performance tests against jTDS? The conventional wisdom in the Java dev community is that when supporting SQL Server from Java, jTDS is the choice, because Microsoft's JDBC implementation has a reputation of being slow and buggy. However jTDS is ageing – its last release was over 2 years ago – whereas Microsoft have been steadily releasing new versions. It might be time for this conventional wisdom to be updated? There is an opportunity for Microsoft to fill the information void comparing jTDS and its own driver, in terms of both stability and performance. Cheers, -Brendan. @brendanh The feedback that jTDS is faster than the Microsoft JDBC is mainly anecdotal. We have on numerous occasions asked for additional details regarding how the tests were conducted and have not received those details. The key with performance benchmarking is to ensure that products are being compared equally (apples to apples instead of apples to oranges). We have heard that jTDS handles Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) communication differently from the Microsoft JDBC Driver. If the performance tests do not take into account these differences, the test results may be skewed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |